Back to Search Start Over

Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors :
Stein B
Weintraub WS
Gebhart SP
Cohen-Bernstein CL
Grosswald R
Liberman HA
Douglas JS Jr
Morris DC
King SB 3rd
Source :
Circulation [Circulation] 1995 Feb 15; Vol. 91 (4), pp. 979-89.
Publication Year :
1995

Abstract

Background: Although patients with diabetes mellitus constitute an important segment of the population undergoing coronary angioplasty, the outcome of these patients has not been well characterized.<br />Methods and Results: Data for 1133 diabetic and 9300 nondiabetic patients undergoing elective angioplasty from 1980 to 1990 were analyzed. Diabetics were older and had more cardiovascular comorbidity. Insulin-requiring (IR) diabetics had diabetes for a longer duration and worse renal and ventricular functions compared with non-IR subjects. Angiographic and clinical successes after angioplasty were high and similar in diabetics and nondiabetics. In-hospital major complications were infrequent (3%), with a trend toward higher death or myocardial infarction in IR diabetics. Five-year survival (89% versus 93%) and freedom from infarction (81% versus 89%) were lower, and bypass surgery and additional angioplasty were required more often in diabetics. In diabetics, only 36% survived free of infarction or additional revascularization compared with 53% of nondiabetics, with a marked attrition in the first year after angioplasty, when restenosis is most common. Multivariate correlates of decreased 5-year survival were older age, reduced ejection fraction, history of heart failure, multivessel disease, and diabetes. IR diabetics had worse long-term survival and infarction-free survival than non-IR diabetics.<br />Conclusions: Coronary angioplasty in diabetics is associated with high success and low complication rates. Although long-term survival is acceptable, diabetics have a higher rate of infarction and a greater need for additional revascularization procedures, probably because of early restenosis and late progression of coronary disease. The most appropriate treatment for these patients remains to be determined.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0009-7322
Volume :
91
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
7850985
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.4.979