Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluating and improving multiple choice papers: true-false questions in public health medicine.
- Source :
-
Medical education [Med Educ] 1994 Sep; Vol. 28 (5), pp. 400-8. - Publication Year :
- 1994
-
Abstract
- The quality of a multiple true-false (MTF) examination paper in public health medicine for 149 clinical medical students was evaluated using predefined performance criteria to offer guidelines for improvement of such a paper. There were 35 questions, each with five true-false branches, and the performance of the overall best 25% of candidates was compared for individual items with that of the overall worst 25%. To improve discrimination between best and worst candidates, 60% of items needed changes, and several indicators were used to identify how, usually because the branch was too easy (26%), unpopular (16%) or too hard (10%). A number of guidelines for writing good MTF questions and for improving them are suggested. The inequity is illustrated of marking systems which do not allocate a negative mark for incorrect answers equal in size to the positive mark for correct ones, with zero for unanswered questions or 'don't know' answers.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0308-0110
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Medical education
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 7845259
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02551.x