Back to Search Start Over

Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors :
Glüer CC
Blake G
Lu Y
Blunt BA
Jergas M
Genant HK
Source :
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA [Osteoporos Int] 1995; Vol. 5 (4), pp. 262-70.
Publication Year :
1995

Abstract

Assessment of precision errors in bone mineral densitometry is important for characterization of a technique's ability to detect longitudinal skeletal changes. Short-term and long-term precision errors should be calculated as root-mean-square (RMS) averages of standard deviations of repeated measurements (SD) and standard errors of the estimate of changes in bone density with time (SEE), respectively. Inadequate adjustment for degrees of freedom and use of arithmetic means instead of RMS averages may cause underestimation of true imprecision by up to 41% and 25% (for duplicate measurements), respectively. Calculation of confidence intervals of precision errors based on the number of repeated measurements and the number of subjects assessed serves to characterize limitations of precision error assessments. Provided that precision error are comparable across subjects, examinations with a total of 27 degrees of freedom result in an upper 90% confidence limit of +30% of the mean precision error, a level considered sufficient for characterizing technique imprecision. We recommend three (or four) repeated measurements per individual in a subject group of at least 14 individuals to characterize short-term (or long-term) precision of a technique.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0937-941X
Volume :
5
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
7492865
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01774016