Dynamics of spike-specific neutralizing antibodies across five-year emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern reveal conserved epitopes that protect against severe COVID-19.

Introduction: Since early 2020, several SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) continue to emerge, evading waning antibody mediated immunity produced by the current Spike-alone based COVID-19 vaccines. This caused a prolonged and persistent COVID-19 pandemic that is going to enter its fifth year. Thus, the need remains for innovative next generation vaccines that would incorporate protective Spike-derived B-cell epitopes that resist immune evasion.
Methods: Towards that goal, in this study we (i) Screened the sequences of Spike among many VOCs and identified conserved and non-conserved linear B-cell epitopes; (ii) Compared titers and neutralization antibodies specific to these conserved and non-conserved B-cell epitopes from serum of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients that were exposed to multiple VOCs across the 5-year COVID-19 pandemic, and (iii) Compared protective efficacy of conserved versus non-conserved B-cell epitopes against the most pathogenic Delta variant in a "humanized" ACE-2/HLA transgenic mouse model.
Results: We found robust conserved B-cell epitope-specific antibody titers and neutralization in sera from asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. In contrast, sera from symptomatic patients contained weaker antibody responses specific to conserved B-cell epitopes. A multi-epitope COVID-19 vaccine that incorporated the conserved B-cell epitopes, but not the non-conserved B-cell epitopes, significantly protected the ACE2/HLA transgenic mice against infection and COVID-19 like symptoms caused by the Delta variant.
Discussion: These findings underscore the importance of conserved B-cell epitopes in generating robust protective immunity against severe COVID-19 symptoms caused by various VOCs, providing valuable insights for the development of broad-spectrum next generation Coronavirus vaccines capable of conferring cross-variant protective immunity.
Competing Interests: Authors HV, DG, JU and LB were employed by the company TechImmune, LLC. Studies of this report were supported by Public Health Service Research grants AI158060, AI150091, AI143348, AI147499, AI143326, AI138764, AI124911, and AI110902 from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIAID to LB and by R43AI174383 to TechImmune, LLC. LB has an equity interest in TechImmune, LLC., a company that may potentially benefit from the research results and serves on the company’s Scientific Advisory Board. LB’s relationship with TechImmune, LLC., has been reviewed and approved by the University of California, Irvine in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
(Copyright © 2025 Zayou, Prakash, Vahed, Dhanushkodi, Quadiri, Belmouden, Lemkhente, Chentoufi, Gil, Ulmer and BenMohamed.)