Fracture Resistance of Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Partial and Full Coverage Crowns and Veneers for Maxillary Canines.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of chairside computer assisted design and computer assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate partial and full-coverage crowns and veneers for maxillary canines.
Methods and Materials: Forty-eight restorations for maxillary right canines (12 per group) were designed as follows: (1) partial crown with finish line in the upper middle third; (2) partial crown with finish line in the lower middle third; (3) traditional labial veneer; and (4) traditional full-coverage crown. Restorations were fabricated out of lithium disilicate (Amber Mill, Hassbio) using a chairside CAD-CAM system (Cerec Dentsply Sirona). Partial and full crowns and veneers were treated with a primer system (Monobond Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent) and cemented using dual-cure resin cement (Variolink Esthetic, Ivoclar Vivadent) and cemented to printed resin dies. Subsequently, the restorations were subjected to 10,000 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C with a dwell time of 30 seconds. The restorations were then loaded axially on the incisal edge in compression to fracture with a flat indenter.
Results: Full-coverage crowns displayed the highest fracture resistance (809±28.57 N) followed by partial crowns with finish line in lower third (649±21.74 N) and crowns with finish line in upper third (421±17.46 N). Veneers displayed the lowest fracture resistance values (259±15.69 N).
Conclusions: The fracture resistance of partial and full-coverage crowns and veneers was significantly influenced by the design. Full coverage crowns displayed the highest fracture resistance and partial crowns showed higher fracture resistance than traditional veneers.
(©Operative Dentistry, 2025.)