Back to Search Start Over

Comparative survival of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Sakurai Y
Balakrishnan P
Kuno T
Yokoyama Y
Bowles M
Takagi H
Denning DA
Nease DB
Kindel TL
Munie S
Source :
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery [Surg Obes Relat Dis] 2024 Dec 09. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 09.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: The difference in survival between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains controversial.<br />Objective: To investigate the comparative survival difference between SG and RYGB in adults with morbid obesity.<br />Setting: A meta-analysis.<br />Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trial were searched through June 30th, 2023 to identify studies comparing SG and RYGB. To minimize confounding, only adjusted outcomes were used from observational studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were revision, reoperation, reintervention, hospitalization, endoscopic procedure, and emergency department visit.<br />Results: Twenty-two studies (10 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 12 observational studies) met the inclusion criteria. Three RCTs and seven observational studies with 333,713 patients (SG, n = 172,909; RYGB, n = 160,804) were analyzed for all-cause mortality, with a weighted median follow-up of 34.4 months. SG was associated with decreased risks of all-cause mortality during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]: .85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .79 to .92), reoperation (HR: .69; 95% CI: .59 to .80), reintervention (HR: .74; 95% CI: .66 to .81), hospitalization (HR: .86; 95% CI: .77 to .97), and endoscopic procedure (HR: .55; 95% CI: 0.40-.76), whereas SG was associated with a higher risk of revision (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.14). Meta-regression suggested consistent survival advantages of SG regardless of the proportion of patients with diabetes or follow-up duration.<br />Conclusion: In adults with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, SG was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality during follow-up compared with RYGB. A large-scale randomized trial with long-term follow-up is still necessary for validation.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-7533
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39732586
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.016