Back to Search Start Over

Computed tomography morphomics and antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors :
O'Mahony AT
Waldron MG
Henry PJ
Shet S
O'Regan PW
Bennett DM
Ryan DJ
Maher MM
Henry MT
Source :
Clinical radiology [Clin Radiol] 2024 Nov 29; Vol. 81, pp. 106759. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 29.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Aim: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a debilitating and fatal lung disease. Changes in body composition potentially correlate with outcomes in patients with IPF.<br />Materials and Methods: Patients with IPF on antifibrotic treatment attending a single institution were identified and retrospectively evaluated (n=84). Three groups were formed based on antifibrotic treatment: pirfenidone group, nintedanib group and pirfenidone-nintedanib switch group. Morphomic analysis of muscle quantity (cross-sectional area in cm <superscript>2</superscript> ) and quality (density in Hounsfield Units) on thoracic computed tomography (CT) was performed using a web-based morphomic segmentation tool. Bilateral erector spinae and pectoralis muscles were measured at pre-defined vertebral levels.<br />Results: All three treatment groups showed a statistically significant decline in forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D <subscript>L</subscript> CO), pectoral muscle cross sectional area (PMA), and erector spinae muscle cross-sectional area (ESMA). Muscle density did not change significantly. Differences existed in analytic morphomics between treatment groups. Patients with a pretreatment body mass index (BMI) below 30 were found to have a significantly greater loss of PMA when treated with nintedanib instead of pirfenidone. FVC and D <subscript>L</subscript> CO did not differ between treatment groups.<br />Conclusion: There were no direct correlations between pulmonary function and morphomic parameters in our entire group of IPF patients. However, between different treatment groups, the rate of muscle bulk loss differed. This is an important consideration for clinicians when deciding on an antifibrotic agent of choice.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-229X
Volume :
81
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39709732
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.106759