Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes after per oral pyloromyotomy based on gastroparesis etiology.

Authors :
Khan SZ
Chambers K
Benson J
Boutros C
Wieland P
Chatha HN
Katz G
Lyons J
Marks JM
Source :
Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2024 Dec 19. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 19.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Per oral pyloromyotomy (POP) has been shown to be effective in patients with gastroparesis. The three most common etiologies of gastroparesis are diabetic, postsurgical, and idiopathic. Our aim was to compare outcomes after POP based on the etiology of gastroparesis.<br />Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients that underwent POP between 2018 and 2023 at a single tertiary academic center. Patient factors such as demographics, previous interventions, and preoperative symptoms were compared between patients of diabetic, post-surgical, and idiopathic gastroparesis. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative symptoms, recurrence, time to recurrence, and reinterventions.<br />Results: A total of 46 patients were included in the study of which 12 had diabetic, 23 had post-surgical, and 11 had idiopathic. The overall median age was 56.5 with a female predominance (61%). Twenty patients (43%) had previous endoscopic intervention, 2 (4%) had prior surgical intervention, and 15 (33%) were on medications at the time of referral. Patients had a median of 2 symptoms preoperatively, the most common being nausea (83%) and emesis (76%). There was no difference in demographic and preoperative factors between patients with different etiologies. There was an overall decrease in the number of symptoms for all patients (pā€‰<ā€‰0.001). There was no difference in postoperative symptoms between cohorts. Fourteen (33%) patients had recurrence of symptoms over a median of 6.5 months with 5 (11%) patients having another endoscopic intervention and 3 (7%) patients having surgical intervention. There were no differences in outcomes between the groups.<br />Conclusions: In our limited cohort, there were no differences in preoperative factors or postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing POP for different etiologies of gastroparesis. There was no differences in recurrence rate or in duration until recurrence. Patients with different etiologies of gastroparesis benefit similarly from POP.<br />Competing Interests: Declarations. Disclosures: This work was not sponsored or funded. Jeffrey Marks receives consulting fees from Steris Endoscopy and Boston Scientific. He has a leadership role on the ACS Board of Governors and the SAGES Governing Board and receives no payments from them. Joshua Lyons receives consulting fees from Steris Endoscopy. Saher-Zahra Khan, Kelly Chambers, Jamie Benson, Christina Boutros, Patrick Wieland, Hamza Nasir Chatha, and Guy Katz have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-2218
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgical endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39702568
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11468-5