Ethical Decision-Making Regarding Life Sustaining Treatment in End-Of-Life Care: A Scoping Review of the Similarities and Differences Between Two Viewpoints.

Decisions on life-sustaining treatment depend on evaluating fundamental ethical principles regarding taking human life. This study aimed to compare the Islamic standpoint with secular views on ethical decision-making in end-of-life care. We conducted a scoping review to analyze and compare articles published in 2000-2022, regarding ethical criteria for withdrawing life-prolonging treatments in dying patients, and the final decision-maker in such cases. The main difference between the two viewpoints, however, lies in the perspective that in Islam to save human life is of utmost importance, and therefore the criteria for treatment benefits, indications, and goals should all be evaluated in the light of this profound Islamic concept. The most significant similarity discovered between the two standpoints was that a terminal patient's wish not to prolong the process of dying should be respected, and the physician's opinion in determining the benefit or futility of treatment is of utmost importance. Comparison of Islamic and Secular perspectives about ethical decision-making in end-of-life care regarding life sustaining treatment indicates that benefits of treatments for patients, and healthcare goals are among the major factors in decision-making according to both viewpoints, and patients, their families, physicians, and the medical team are all involved in making the final decision.
Competing Interests: The authors stated that there was no conflict of interest.