Tensile bond strength of soft relining materials to CAD-CAM denture base materials.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the tensile bond strength between soft relining materials and different denture base materials.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in accordance with ISO 23401:2023. A total of 288 rectangular specimens (10L × 10H × 20W mm) were fabricated from various denture base materials, including a heat-compression polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), two types of milled PMAA, and three types of 3D-printed resins, with bonding using two chairside soft reline materials (Coe-Soft and Lynal). Specimens were placed in distilled water for 24 h before applying tensile force at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The tensile bond strength values (MPa) were calculated at maximum tensile force (N) before failure. Two-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests were used to assess the effect of denture base and soft reline materials on the tensile bond strength (α = 0.05).
Results: A significant difference in the tensile bond strength was found among the different types of denture base materials (p < 0.001), regardless of relining material type. Lynal-relined milled IvoBase demonstrated the highest tensile bond strength (0.5 ± 0.06 MPa), followed by Lynal-relined milled Lucitone (0.44 ± 0.03 MPa), both of which are clinically acceptable as they are equal or greater 0.44 MPa. The lowest tensile bond strength was detected in Lynal-relined 3D printed FotoDent (0.09 ± 0.02 MPa). Lynal exhibited significantly higher tensile bond strength (p < 0.05) than Coe-Soft soft reline material when bonded to PMMA bases; however, there was no significant difference between Lynal and Coe-Soft when bonded to 3D-printed base materials (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The tensile bond strength between soft relining materials and denture bases is material-dependent, influenced by both the type of denture base material and the type of soft relining material used.
(© 2024 by the American College of Prosthodontists.)