Back to Search Start Over

The effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on energy and macronutrients intake in adults: a grade-assessed systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors :
Rostampour K
Moghtaderi F
Najafi A
Seyedjafari B
Salehi-Abargouei A
Source :
Frontiers in nutrition [Front Nutr] 2024 Nov 13; Vol. 11, pp. 1475962. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 13 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives: The effect of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) on long-term satiety is not well understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the effect of NNSs on long-term total energy and macronutrients intake.<br />Methods: Online databases including Scopus, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2024 to find relevant randomized control trials (RCTs). A random effects model was used for estimating the overall effects.<br />Results: The results showed a reducing effect of NNSs consumption vs. sugar on total energy intake [total energy intake change = -175.26 kcal/day, 95% confidence interval (CI): -296.47 to -54.06, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 61.19%] and carbohydrate intake [Hedges' g = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.06, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 58.99%]. While, NNSs intake vs. water was not associated with significant change in total energy intake [total energy intake change = 29.94 kcal/day, 95% CI: -70.37 to 130.24, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 34.98%] and carbohydrate intake [Hedges' g = 0.28, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.58, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 65.26%]. The Consumption of NNSs compared to the either sugar or water did not have a significant effect on fat intake [Hedges' g <subscript>sugar</subscript>  = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.26, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 8.73%/ fat intake change <subscript>water</subscript>  = 0.20 g/day, 95% CI: -3.48 to 3.88, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0%] and Protein intake [Hedges' g <subscript>sugar</subscript>  = 0.16, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.42, I <subscript> <superscript>2</superscript> </subscript>  = 50.83%/Hedges' g <subscript>water</subscript>  = 0.00, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.16, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0%].<br />Conclusion: In summary, our findings suggest that NNSs consumption may be effective in reducing total energy and carbohydrate intake compared to sugar.<br />Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=432816, CRD42023432816.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Rostampour, Moghtaderi, Najafi, Seyedjafari and Salehi-Abargouei.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2296-861X
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in nutrition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39606579
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1475962