Back to Search
Start Over
Optimising children's movement assessment batteries through application of motivational and attentional manipulations.
- Source :
-
Human movement science [Hum Mov Sci] 2024 Dec; Vol. 98, pp. 103302. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 25. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- An external focus of attention, enhanced expectancies, and autonomy support (i.e., OPTIMAL factors) are key factors to optimise motor performance and uncover latent movement capabilities. However, research on the combination of OPTIMAL factors, particularly in children's dynamic movement settings is limited. Therefore, this study examined the combined effects of OPTIMAL factors on children's performance on a dynamic movement assessment battery, hypothesising higher performance scores in the optimised version of the assessment battery versus standardised version of the assessment. Forty-nine children (15 boys, 34 girls; mean age 10.61 ± 1.38 years) completed the Dragon Challenge (DC) dynamic movement assessment battery. Performance was measured via a summation of movement process (technique), outcome, and time-to-completion scores (max score N = 54) with higher scores representing better performance. Participants completed a standardised and an optimised version of the DC in a counterbalanced fashion. For the latter, DC protocols were optimised via the provision of choice (autonomy support); external focus instructions augmented by simple knowledge statement, positive feedback and promotion of a growth mindset (Enhanced expectancies). Results indicate that motor performance (DC score) was better in the optimised (M = 31.08 ± 6.66) vs. standardised (M = 29.04 ± 5.88). The findings indicate that the combination of OPTIMAL factors can improve children's motor performance in dynamic movement settings and that standardised motor assessment may not reveal children's true movement capabilities.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. This research did not revive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-7646
- Volume :
- 98
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Human movement science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39591811
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2024.103302