Back to Search
Start Over
Pulmonary 129 Xe MRI: CNN Registration and Segmentation to Generate Ventilation Defect Percent with Multi-center Validation.
- Source :
-
Academic radiology [Acad Radiol] 2024 Nov 23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 23. - Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- Ahead of Print
-
Abstract
- Rationale and Objectives: Hyperpolarized <superscript>129</superscript> Xe MRI quantifies ventilation-defect-percent (VDP), the ratio of <superscript>129</superscript> Xe signal-void to the anatomic <superscript>1</superscript> H MRI thoracic-cavity-volume. VDP is associated with airway inflammation and disease control and serves as a treatable trait in therapy studies. Semi-automated VDP pipelines require time-intensive observer interactions. Current convolutional neural network (CNN) approaches for quantifying VDP lack external validation, which limits multicenter utilization. Our objective was to develop an automated and externally validated deep-learning pipeline to quantify pulmonary <superscript>129</superscript> Xe MRI VDP.<br />Materials and Methods: <superscript>1</superscript> H and <superscript>129</superscript> Xe MRI data from the primary site (Site1) were used to train and test a CNN segmentation and registration pipeline, while two independent sites (Site2 and Site3) provided external validation. Semi-automated and CNN-based registration error was measured using mean-absolute-error (MAE) while segmentation error was measured using generalized-Dice-similarity coefficient (gDSC). CNN and semi-automated VDP were compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.<br />Results: Training/testing used data from 205 participants (healthy volunteers, asthma, COPD, long-COVID; mean age=54 ± 16y; 119 females) from Site1. External validation used data from 71 participants. CNN and semi-automated <superscript>1</superscript> H and <superscript>129</superscript> Xe registrations agreed (MAE=0.3°, R <superscript>2</superscript> =0.95 rotation; 1.1%, R <superscript>2</superscript> =0.79 scaling; 0.2/0.5px, R <superscript>2</superscript> =0.96/0.95, x/y-translation; all p < .001). Thoracic-cavity and ventilation segmentations were also spatially corresponding (gDSC=0.92 and 0.88, respectively). CNN VDP correlated with semi-automated VDP (Site1 R <superscript>2</superscript> /ρ = .97/.95, bias=-0.5%; Site2 R <superscript>2</superscript> /ρ = .85/.93, bias=-0.9%; Site3 R <superscript>2</superscript> /ρ = .95/.89, bias=-0.8%, all p < .001).<br />Conclusion: An externally validated CNN registration/segmentation model demonstrated strong agreement with low error compared to the semi-automated method. CNN and semi-automated registrations, thoracic-cavity-volume and ventilation-volume segmentations were highly correlated with high gDSC for the datasets.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1878-4046
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Academic radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39581785
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.029