Back to Search
Start Over
Fine Motor Skills, Reading Speed, and Self-Reported Quality of Life in Adults With Amblyopia and/or Strabismus.
- Source :
-
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science [Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci] 2024 Nov 04; Vol. 65 (13), pp. 48. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess fine motor skills and reading proficiency in adults with amblyopia and/or strabismus, and to determine how these relate to clinical measures of vision and self-reported vision-related quality of life.<br />Methods: Fine motor skills (Manual dexterity - Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency [BOT-2]) and reading performance (International Reading Speed Texts [IReST]) were assessed in 23 adults with non-strabismic amblyopia, 20 with non-amblyopic strabismus, 52 with both amblyopia and strabismus, and 19 with normal visual development. Visual acuity and binocular function score (BFS), obtained from stereoacuity and presence/absence of suppression, were also determined. Vision-related quality of life was assessed with the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) in those with amblyopia and/or strabismus. Statistical analysis included ANOVA and multiple regression models.<br />Results: Participants with amblyopia and/or strabismus exhibited poorer performance in all five manual dexterity sub-items and the overall standardized score (P < 0.05). The reading rate was significantly slower across all amblyopia/strabismus groups (P < 0.05). Poorer fine motor skills and slower reading performance were associated with each other (R = 0.29). Clinical visual characteristics (visual acuity [VA], BFS, and presence of strabismus) explained 39% of the variance in fine motor skills score (R2 = 0.39), however, these explained only 6% of the variance in reading speed (R2 = 0.06). Self-report of functional ability related most to BFS, whereas psychosocial impact related to the presence of strabismus. The clinical and functional characteristics predicted 4% of the variance in functional impact score (R2 = 0.038) and explained 16% of the variance in psychosocial impact score (R2 = 0.16).<br />Conclusions: The functional and psychosocial effects of amblyopia and strabismus are common and persist into adulthood, with outcomes inadequately accounted for by clinical measures of vision.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Adult
Middle Aged
Young Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Aged
Adolescent
Quality of Life
Amblyopia physiopathology
Amblyopia psychology
Reading
Strabismus physiopathology
Strabismus psychology
Visual Acuity physiology
Motor Skills physiology
Self Report
Vision, Binocular physiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1552-5783
- Volume :
- 65
- Issue :
- 13
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39576625
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.65.13.48