Back to Search Start Over

Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean sections: insights from a 15 year experience at a tertiary care center and a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors :
Doroldi S
Piemonti L
Valeriani M
Larcher L
Lenzi J
Contro E
Source :
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics [Arch Gynecol Obstet] 2024 Nov 21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 21.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Purpose: To identify potential risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section (CS).<br />Methods: We conducted an observational case-control study from 2009 to 2024 at our Tertiary Care Hospital, matching each bladder injury case with four controls. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus, from inception to 2024; eligible studies were case-control studies assessing risk factors for bladder injury during CS. Random-effects regression with the restricted maximum likelihood method was employed for the meta-analysis.<br />Results: We identified 23 cases of bladder injury out of 15,260 CSs at our hospital, resulting in a rate of 0.15%. Women with bladder injuries were significantly older (p = 0.022), with 47.8% having a history of previous CS, while no significant differences were observed between groups regarding prior abdominal surgery, endometriosis, or body mass index. The systematic review included four case-control studies, whose data were meta-analyzed with our patients, identifying several significant predictors: adhesions (OR 18.6, 95% CI 8.86-39.0), repeated CS (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.02-5.23), emergent procedures (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.71-5.80), failed vaginal birth after cesarean (OR 4.74, 95% CI 2.18-10.3), second stage of labor (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.80-4.29), and macrosomia (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.57).<br />Conclusions: Key risk factors for cesarean bladder injury include prior CSs, adhesions, second stage of labor, macrosomia, failed VBAC, and emergent procedures. Identifying these risk factors is critical for preoperative assessment and counseling, allowing for better surgical planning and improved outcomes.<br />Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical approval: Ethics approval was not required. The name of the ethics committee is “Comitato Etico Area Vasta Emilia Centro – AVEC, Policlinico Sant’Orsola”.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-0711
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39567413
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07826-2