Back to Search Start Over

Long-term outcomes comparison of Bentall-De Bono-versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement: An updated systematic review and reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis.

Authors :
Formica F
Gallingani A
D'Alessandro S
Tuttolomondo D
Hernandez-Vaquero D
Singh G
Grassa G
Pattuzzi C
Maestri F
Nicolini F
Source :
International journal of cardiology [Int J Cardiol] 2024 Nov 16; Vol. 419, pp. 132728. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 16.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: For patients with aortic root dilatation and a structurally normal aortic valve (AV) undergoing composite aortic valve-graft (Bentall-De Bono) versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedures there are conflicting data regarding early and long-term benefits. We undertook a study-level meta-analysis to compare the results of both procedures.<br />Methods: Three databases were assessed, and both randomized trials and observational studies were considered eligible. Kaplan-Meier curves of long-term survival and reoperation risk were reconstructed and compared with Cox linear regression and incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Landmark analysis and time-varying hazard ratio (HR) were analyzed. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for early mortality, postoperative stroke, and re-exploration for postoperative bleeding. A random effects model was used. Sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out-analysis, meta-regression and subgroups analysis.<br />Results: 1456 articles were identified, including 39 observational studies, totaling 14,651 patients (Bentall-De Bono = 9557 and VSARR = 5094). Twelve studies were adjusted. The mean weighted follow-up was 5.05 ± 3.7 years. VSARR was associated with significantly greater survival (HR = 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.45-0.57; p < 0.0001) at 15-year follow-up. The reoperation risk was higher following VSARR (HR = 1.30; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.63; p = 0.02.), although time-varying HR model and landmark analysis reported an increased risk of reoperation within 5 years after VSARR (HR = 1.57; 95 % CI, 1.23-2.01; p < 0.001), after which the difference disappeared. Subgroups analysis of studies excluding aortic dissection showed a comparable rate of late reoperation.<br />Conclusions: VSARR is associated with improved long-term survival compared to Bentall-De Bono. The risk of late reoperation is higher within 5 years following VSARR, after which the two procedures are comparable.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Non declared.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1874-1754
Volume :
419
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39551099
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132728