Back to Search Start Over

Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy affects second-line treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors :
Mori K
Numakura K
Matsushita Y
Kojima T
Osawa T
Sazuka T
Hatakeyama S
Goto K
Yamana K
Kandori S
Kimura T
Nishiyama N
Bando Y
Fujita K
Ueda K
Tanaka H
Tomida R
Kurahashi T
Kitamura H
Miyake H
Habuchi T
Source :
Cancer science [Cancer Sci] 2024 Nov 17. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 17.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has a long-term response rate of 30% for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, 20% of patients develop primary resistant disease (PRD) to NIVO+IPI and show poor survival outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of PRD as a second-line treatment in patients with mRCC. The data used in this multi-institutional, retrospective cohort were collected between August 2015 and January 2023. In total, 189 patients with mRCC were treated with NIVO+IPI and then with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Associations between PRD and progression-free survival of second-line treatment (PFS), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The median age at NIVO+IPI initiation was 67 years in the male-dominant population (n = 140, 74.1%), and most patients had clear cell histology (n = 140, 74.1%). PRD was recorded in 42 (22.2%) of 189 patients during NIVO+IPI therapy. Patients who experienced PRD showed poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.788; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.176-2.718; p = 0.007), PFS2 (HR, 4.127; 95% CI, 2.649-6.431; p < 0.001), and OS (HR, 3.330; 95% CI, 2.040-5.437; p < 0.001). Before starting second-line therapy, patients with PRD tended to have a poor performance status compared with non-PRD patients and a higher IMDC risk. Second-line drug therapy was not associated with treatment outcomes in patients with PRD. PRD in patients with mRCC receiving NIVO+IPI as first-line treatment was associated with poor clinical course, even with second-line therapy.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1349-7006
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39550694
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.16326