Differences that matter: inquiry-based learning approach to research writing instruction.

According to the extant literature, inquiry-based learning instruction can be an effective pedagogical tool as it frames learning as problem-solving activities. However, considerable debate exists about how to implement inquiry-based instruction. The present study compared the academic performance and engagement (as measured by course learning outcomes) of freshmen exposed to one of two inquiry-based learning modes differing in the volume of load-reducing instruction. The context was a writing-intensive, research-oriented course that enrolled second-language speakers with a didactic past. Thus, the study also examined whether the two modes differentiated freshmen's second-language writing anxiety, a key emotive negative reaction likely to emerge in a writing-intensive course. At the end of the semester, the condition that involved greater load-reducing instruction before problem-solving activities yielded superior attainment of learning outcomes encompassing knowledge acquisition and use of problem-solving skills. No differences in engagement, withdrawal rates, or writing anxiety were detected. Writing anxiety was only minimally related to students' performance and engagement as measured by the course learning outcomes. These findings illustrate that ostensibly minimal variations in the implementation of inquiry-based learning can have a selective impact on cognitive rather than emotive processing.
Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval Obtained from PMU Deanship of Research. There is no number or code associated with the ethical approval. PMU Deanship of Research either grants or denies approval (yes/no vote). Informed consent It was obtained from participants (as noted in the manuscript). The informed consent form was deemed to comply with the APA ethical guidelines for the treatment of human participants. Human participants or animals The data-collection process was approved by the Deanship of Research of the hosting institution to comply with the guidelines of the Office for Human Research Protections of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)