Back to Search Start Over

Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.

Authors :
Tao H
Yu F
Yang L
Pei X
Mao S
Fan X
Source :
BMC cancer [BMC Cancer] 2024 Nov 04; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 1352. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 04.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.<br />Methods: A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> ) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> ), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.<br />Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> and GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> and GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> and GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> and GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> and GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.<br />Conclusions: PAX1 <superscript>m</superscript> and GYPC <superscript>m</superscript> demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2407
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39497123
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4