Back to Search Start Over

Current practice of screening and antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent Gram-negative bacterial infection in high-risk haematology patients: results from a pan-European survey.

Authors :
Stemler J
Gavriilaki E
Hlukhareva O
Khanna N
Neofytos D
Akova M
Pagano L
Cisneros JM
Cornely OA
Salmanton-García J
Source :
Therapeutic advances in infectious disease [Ther Adv Infect Dis] 2024 Oct 29; Vol. 11, pp. 20499361241271863. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 29 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Bacterial infections frequently occur in haematological patients, especially during prolonged neutropenia after intensive chemotherapy, often leading to bloodstream infections and pneumonia.<br />Objective: Routine antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for high-risk haematology patients is still debated while prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is rising globally. We aimed to assess the current practice of AMP in this population.<br />Design: Cross-sectional observational survey study.<br />Methods: Haematologists and infectious diseases physicians Europewide were invited to an online survey including questions on routine screening for GNB, incidence of MDR-GNB colonization, antimicrobial prophylaxis practices, rates of bloodstream infections (BSI), ICU admission and mortality differentiated by infections due to GNB versus MDR-GNB.<br />Results: 120 haematology centres from 28 countries participated. Screening for MDR-GNB is performed in 86.7% of centres, mostly via rectal swabs (58.3%). In 39.2% of routine AMP is used, mostly with fluoroquinolones. Estimates of GNB-BSI yielded higher rates in patients not receiving anti-GNB prophylaxis than in those who do for E. coli (10% vs 7%) Klebsiella spp. (10% vs 5%), and Pseudomonas spp. (5% vs 4%). Rates for MDR-GNB infection were estimated lower in centres that administer AMP for MDR E. coli (5% vs 3%) Klebsiella spp. (5% vs 3%), and Pseudomonas spp. (2% vs 1%). In an exploratory analysis, Southern and Eastern European countries expected higher rates of MDR-GNB infections with lower ICU admission and mortality rates which may be subject to estimation bias.<br />Conclusion: Screening for MDR-GNB is frequently performed. AMP against GNB infections is still often implemented. Estimated BSI rates are rather low, while the rate of MDR-GNB infections rises. Tailored prophylaxis including antimicrobial stewardship becomes more important.<br /> (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2049-9361
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39493728
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241271863