Back to Search Start Over

Comparing quality of life in traditional face-to-face visits with a hybrid approach of telemedicine with in-person follow-ups in recent users of advanced closed-loop systems: a randomized controlled clinical trial in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors :
Nattero-Chávez L
de La Calle E
Lecumberri-Pascual E
Bayona Cebada A
Ruiz Gracia T
Quintero Tobar A
Lorenzo Moñino M
Sánchez Rodríguez C
Izquierdo A
Escobar-Morreale HF
Luque-Ramírez M
Source :
Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism [Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab] 2024 Oct 25; Vol. 15, pp. 20420188241288789. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 25 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to assess the effect of a hybrid telemedicine approach, in conjunction with face-to-face follow-up, on the quality of life in recent users of an advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system.<br />Methods: A 1-year open randomized (1:1) clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04900636). Participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) recent users of an AHCL system (Minimed <superscript>®</superscript> 780G) for at least 2-6 months, and ⩾18 years old were eligible. The primary outcome was the change in quality of life measured by the Type 1 Diabetes Life (ViDa1) Questionnaire from baseline to 12 months of hybrid telemedicine plus face-to-face follow-up compared to standard clinical practice. Additionally, impacts on A <subscript>1c</subscript> levels, glucose metrics, advert events, and safety outcomes were assessed.<br />Results: Between January and December 2021, 46 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the hybrid telemedicine group ( n  = 23) or the control group ( n  = 23); 45 participants completed the study, with only 1 from the control group withdrawing before visit 3. At baseline, mean age was 37 ± 15 years and A <subscript>1c</subscript> was 6.9 ± 0.5%. After 12 months, no statistically significant differences in ViDa1 scores between groups were observed. Despite reducing in-person visits in the hybrid follow-up arm, there were no increases in adverse events. Overall, A <subscript>1c</subscript> levels significantly decreased from 6.9 ± 0.5% at baseline to 6.7 ± 0.5% after 12 months ( P  = 0.006) without differences between treatment arms, accompanied by reductions in glycemic variability and time below the target range.<br />Conclusion: Our study suggests that there were no significant differences in ViDa1 scores between the two groups at the end of the follow-up. However, among adult patients with T1D who recently adopted an AHCL system, satisfactory glycemic control can be attained through a hybrid follow-up approach, reducing face-to-face visits, without increasing technical complications.<br /> (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2042-0188
Volume :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39493410
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188241288789