Back to Search Start Over

Comparison between the EKFC-equation and machine learning models to predict Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Authors :
Nakano FK
Åkesson A
de Boer J
Dedja K
D'hondt R
Haredasht FN
Björk J
Courbebaisse M
Couzi L
Ebert N
Eriksen BO
Dalton RN
Derain-Dubourg L
Gaillard F
Garrouste C
Grubb A
Jacquemont L
Hansson M
Kamar N
Legendre C
Littmann K
Mariat C
Melsom T
Rostaing L
Rule AD
Schaeffner E
Sundin PO
Bökenkamp A
Berg U
Åsling-Monemi K
Selistre L
Larsson A
Nyman U
Lanot A
Pottel H
Delanaye P
Vens C
Source :
Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2024 Nov 02; Vol. 14 (1), pp. 26383. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In clinical practice, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a measurement of kidney functioning, is normally calculated using equations, such as the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation. Despite being the most general equation, EKFC, just like previously proposed approaches, can still struggle to achieve satisfactory performance, limiting its clinical applicability. As a possible solution, recently machine learning (ML) has been investigated to improve GFR prediction, nonetheless the literature still lacks a general and multi-center study. Using a dataset with 19,629 patients from 13 cohorts, we investigate if ML can improve GFR prediction in comparison to EKFC. More specifically, we compare diverse ML methods, which were allowed to use age, sex, serum creatinine, cystatin C, height, weight and BMI as features, in internal and external cohorts against EKFC. The results show that the most performing ML method, random forest (RF), and EKFC are very competitive where RF and EKFC achieved respectively P10 and P30 values of 0.45 (95% CI 0.44;0.46) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.88;0.90), whereas EKFC yielded 0.44 (95% CI 0.43; 0.44) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.88; 0.90), considering the entire cohort. Small differences were, however, observed in patients younger than 12 years where RF slightly outperformed EKFC.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-2322
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Scientific reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39487227
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77618-w