Alterations of the pulvinar in posterior cortical atrophy: A multimodal MRI study.

Background: Although the pulvinar is known for its visual function and extensive connections with cortical areas, the volumetric change and functional connectivity of the pulvinar in posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) remain unclear.
Objective: To identify functional and volumetric changes of the pulvinar in PCA patients and the relevant associations with higher visual dysfunction.
Methods: A total of 29 patients with PCA and 30 normal controls were recruited. Each participant underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and both structural and resting-state functional MRI scanning. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and seed-based functional connectivity analyses were conducted to assess pulvinar gray matter volume as well as functional connectivity between the pulvinar and whole brain regions. A partial correlation analysis was performed to analyze neuropsychological tests and pulvinar imaging data.
Results: Cognitive and visual functions including visuospatial processing, visual perception, episodic memory, and naming were impaired among PCA patients. Marked pulvinar atrophy was noted in PCA patients. Furthermore, functional connectivity between the pulvinar and precuneus was significantly decreased in PCA patients as compared to normal controls (FWE corrected; P < .001). Gray matter volume of the left pulvinar was found to associate with object agnosia (r = .53, P = .005) and prosopagnosia (r = .54, P = .005) among PCA patients. Gray matter volume of the right pulvinar was found to be associated with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (r = -.52, P = .006) and Activities of Daily Living (r = -.59, P = .002) scores. Prosopagnosia correlated positively to the functional connectivity of the left pulvinar and left middle temporal.
Conclusion: Our findings support pulvinar degeneration and its contributions in PCA.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)