Back to Search Start Over

Docetaxel Versus Androgen-Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSI) as Second-Line Therapy After Failure of First-Line Alternative ARSI for the Elderly ≥ 75 Years Old With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A SPARTACUSS-Meet-URO 26 Real-World Study.

Authors :
Patrikidou A
Saieva C
Lee-Ying R
Nuzzo PV
Zarif TE
McClure H
Davidsohn M
Eid M
Spinelli GP
Catalano F
Cremante M
Fotia G
Rossetti S
Valenca L
Vauchier C
Ottanelli C
Andrade L
Gennusa V
Mestre RP
Fornarini G
Pignata S
Procopio G
Santini D
Ravi P
Sweeney C
Heng D
De Giorgi U
Fizazi K
Russo A
Francini E
Source :
Clinical genitourinary cancer [Clin Genitourin Cancer] 2024 Oct 05; Vol. 22 (6), pp. 102230. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 05.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs) abiraterone acetate (AA) enzalutamide (Enza), are currently the standard first-line (L1) treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and docetaxel (D) is reserved as second-line (L2) after ARSI failure. Nonetheless, D use in men ≥ 75 years old is restricted owing to treatment toxicities and patient comorbidities, and a L2 alternative ARSI is frequently used. We aimed to evaluate real-life survival and toxicity outcomes of these elderly patients after failure of L1 ARSI treatment.<br />Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and safety in a real-world international cohort of consecutive patients ≥ 75 years old when starting L1 ARSI for mCRPC according to the choice of L2 treatment (D versus alternative ARSI).<br />Results: Of the 122 identified patients, 57 (46.7%) had received L2 ARSI and 65 (53.3%) L2 D. No difference was found in the L1 overall survival (OS) for the ARSI and D groups (32.8 vs. 30.0 months, respectively; Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77-1.95; P = .40) or in the L2 OS (18.5 vs. 17.8 months, respectively; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.69-1.74; P = .71). No difference was observed for rPFS from L2 (P = .12), although a trend was observed for a numerically improved rPFS on D.<br />Conclusion: Within the limitations of a retrospective design and small population, our study suggests that D or ARSI after failure of L1 alternative ARSI are clinically comparable L2 options for elderly patients with mCRPC.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosure Loana Bueno Valencia received consulting fees from Janssen and travel grants from Janssen, Astellas, and Bayer. The other authors report no competing interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1938-0682
Volume :
22
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39461026
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102230