Sex-dependent interplay of phosphate and inflammation on muscle strength irrespective of muscle mass in middle-aged and older adults.

Background: Elevated circulatory phosphate levels are linked to age-related muscle dysfunction, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated the hypothesis that inflammation plays a role in connecting elevated phosphate levels to muscular dysfunction in middle-aged and older individuals and explored potential sex-based differences in these associations.
Methods: The study, based on the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study Cohort, analyzed individuals' serum phosphate and hsCRP levels. Sex-specific analyses explored links between circulatory phosphate, inflammation, and muscle profiles (mass, handgrip strength, and walking speed). The study also examined potential mediation or synergistic effects of inflammation in the circulatory phosphate-muscle relationship.
Results: The study included 2006 participants (mean age: 65.5 ± 6.5 years; 49.8 % men). Women exhibited higher circulatory phosphate levels than men. Linear analyses revealed that higher phosphate levels were significantly associated with weaker handgrip strength but not with reduced muscle mass in both men and women. In women, circulatory phosphate was not associated with inflammation (hsCRP levels), while in men, higher phosphate levels were significantly associated with higher hsCRP levels. In men, a synergistic effect was observed, where the combination of high hsCRP and elevated phosphate levels had a more pronounced impact on reducing handgrip strength than either factor alone.
Conclusions: This study highlights a sex-specific association of inflammation in the mechanisms of hyperphosphatemia-related muscle weakness. The findings emphasize the importance of managing both hyperphosphatemia and chronic inflammation to mitigate their collective impact on muscle function, particularly in older men. Addressing these factors is crucial for promoting muscle health in later life.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declared no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)