Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Complicated by Red Blood Cell-Coated Intraocular Lens: A Case Report.

This study aimed to characterize the detailed multi-modal imaging findings of red blood cell (RBC)-coated intraocular lenses (IOLs). A 68-year-old patient with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy underwent vitrectomy for subretinal and vitreous hemorrhage. Subsequently, RBC-coated IOL was diagnosed. The iris and IOL surface exhibited a reddish discoloration, while the fundus was completely obscured by slit-lamp examination and ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. However, posterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) allowed visualization of retinal structures. Anterior segment OCT revealed no opacity in the optic part of the IOL in either eye, with comparable findings between both eyes. Given the high absorption spectrum of blood in the visible light range and its minimum absorption at approximately 1100 nm, RBC-coated IOLs may minimally affect anterior and posterior segment OCT images. Conversely, they significantly impair slit-lamp examination and direct fundus visualization. The discrepancy in imaging outcomes between fundus image and OCT could be a characteristic feature of RBC-coated IOLs. This may serve as a characteristic of RBC-coated IOLs. In cases of suspected IOL opacification or RBC-coated IOL following vitreous hemorrhage, anterior segment OCT can evaluate the IOL optic clarity. Additionally, comparing image quality between fundus photographs and posterior segment OCT may provide valuable diagnostic information.
Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
(Copyright © 2024, Sawazono et al.)