Back to Search Start Over

Cost-effectiveness of an extended-role general practitioner clinic for persistent physical symptoms: results from the Multiple Symptoms Study 3 (MSS3) pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors :
Neilson AR
Mooney C
Sutton L
White D
Dawson J
Rowlands G
Thomas RE
Woodward J
Deary V
Burton C
Source :
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [Value Health] 2024 Oct 17. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 17.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an extended-role general practitioner (GP) symptoms clinic (SC), added to usual care (UC) for patients with multiple persistent physical symptoms (sometimes known as "medically unexplained symptoms").<br />Methods: A 52-week within-trial cost-utility analysis of a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing SC+UC (n=178) against UC alone (n=176), conducted from the primary perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal and social services (PSS). Base-case quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were measured using EQ-5D-5L. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation (MI). Cost-effectiveness results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs). Uncertainty was explored using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (using 1000 non-parametric bootstrapped samples) and sensitivity analysis (including societal costs, using SF-6D and capability ICECAP-A outcomes to estimate QALYs and years of full capability (YFC) respectively, varying intervention costs, missing data mechanism assumptions).<br />Results: Multiple imputation analysis showed that, compared to UC alone, SC+UC was more expensive [(adjusted mean cost difference: 704; 95% CI:£605, £807)] and more effective [(adjusted mean QALY difference: 0.0447 (95% CI:0.0067, 0.0826)] yielding an ICER of £15,765/QALY, INMB of £189.22 (95% CI:-£573.62, £948.28) and a 69% probability of the SC+UC intervention arm being cost-effective at a threshold of £20000 per QALY. Results were robust to most sensitivity analyses, but sensitive to missing data assumptions (2 of the 8 scenarios investigated), SF-6D and ICECAP-A quality of life outcomes.<br />Conclusions: A Symptoms Clinic is likely to be a potentially cost-effective treatment for patients with persistent physical symptoms.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4733
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39426516
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.015