Back to Search Start Over

Publicly Available Dental Image Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.

Authors :
Uribe SE
Issa J
Sohrabniya F
Denny A
Kim NN
Dayo AF
Chaurasia A
Sofi-Mahmudi A
Büttner M
Schwendicke F
Source :
Journal of dental research [J Dent Res] 2024 Dec; Vol. 103 (13), pp. 1365-1374. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 18.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in dentistry requires large and well-annotated datasets. However, the availability of public dental imaging datasets remains unclear. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of all publicly available dental imaging datasets to address this gap and support AI development. This observational study searched all publicly available dataset resources (academic databases, preprints, and AI challenges), focusing on datasets/articles from 2020 to 2023, with PubMed searches extending back to 2011. We comprehensively searched for dental AI datasets containing images (intraoral photos, scans, radiographs, etc.) using relevant keywords. We included datasets of >50 images obtained from publicly available sources. We extracted dataset characteristics, patient demographics, country of origin, dataset size, ethical clearance, image details, FAIRness metrics, and metadata completeness. We screened 131,028 records and extracted 16 unique dental imaging datasets. The datasets were obtained from Kaggle (18.8%), GitHub, Google, Mendeley, PubMed, Zenodo (each 12.5%), Grand-Challenge, OSF, and arXiv (each 6.25%). The primary focus was tooth segmentation (62.5%) and labeling (56.2%). Panoramic radiography was the most common imaging modality (58.8%). Of the 13 countries, China contributed the most images (2,413). Of the datasets, 75% contained annotations, whereas the methods used to establish labels were often unclear and inconsistent. Only 31.2% of the datasets reported ethical approval, and 56.25% did not specify a license. Most data were obtained from dental clinics (50%). Intraoral radiographs had the highest findability score in the FAIR assessment, whereas cone-beam computed tomography datasets scored the lowest in all categories. These findings revealed a scarcity of publicly available imaging dental data and inconsistent metadata reporting. To promote the development of robust, equitable, and generalizable AI tools for dental diagnostics, treatment, and research, efforts are needed to address data scarcity, increase diversity, mandate metadata completeness, and ensure FAIRness in AI dental imaging research.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: F.S. co-founded a startup focusing on dental radiograph analysis using artificial intelligence.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1544-0591
Volume :
103
Issue :
13
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of dental research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39422586
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241272052