Back to Search Start Over

Through the patients' eyes: psychometric evaluation of the 64-item version of the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT-64).

Authors :
Christalle E
Zeh S
Führes H
Schellhorn A
Hahlweg P
Zill JM
Härter M
Bokemeyer C
Gallinat J
Gebhardt C
Magnussen C
Müller V
Schmalstieg-Bahr K
Strahl A
Kriston L
Scholl I
Source :
BMJ quality & safety [BMJ Qual Saf] 2024 Oct 16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 16.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are valuable tools to evaluate patient-centredness (PC) from the patients' perspective. Despite their utility, a comprehensive PREM addressing PC has been lacking. To bridge this gap, we developed the preliminary version of the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT), a disease-generic tool based on the integrative model of PC comprising 16 dimensions. It demonstrated content validity. This study aimed to test its psychometric properties and to develop a final 64-item version (EPAT-64).<br />Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included adult patients treated for cardiovascular diseases, cancer, musculoskeletal diseases and mental disorders in inpatient or outpatient settings in Germany. For each dimension of PC, we selected four items based on item characteristics such as item difficulty and corrected item-total correlation. We tested structural validity using confirmatory factor analysis, examined reliability by McDonald's Omega and tested construct validity by examining correlations with general health status and satisfaction with care.<br />Results: Analysis of data from 2.024 patients showed excellent acceptance and acceptable item-total correlations for all EPAT-64 items, with few items demonstrating ceiling effects. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated the best fit for a bifactor model, where each item loaded on both a general factor and a dimension-specific factor. Omega showed high reliability for the general factor, while varying for specific dimensions. Construct validity was confirmed by absence of strong correlations with general health status and a strong correlation of the general factor with satisfaction with care.<br />Conclusions: EPAT-64 demonstrated commendable psychometric properties. This tool allows comprehensive assessment of PC, offering flexibility to users who can measure each dimension with a four-item module or choose modules based on their needs. EPAT-64 serves multiple purposes, including quality improvement and evaluation of interventions aiming to enhance PC. Its versatility empowers users in diverse healthcare settings.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: PH is a board member of the International Shared Decision Making Society, a charitable scientific society. IS received honoraria for presentations and speeches on patient-centred care from the following commercial entities: onkowissen.de GmbH and ClinSol GmbH & Co KG.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-5423
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ quality & safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39414377
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017434