Back to Search Start Over

Multicenter validation of automated detection of paramagnetic rim lesions on brain MRI in multiple sclerosis.

Authors :
Chen L
Ren Z
Clark KA
Lou C
Liu F
Cao Q
Manning AR
Martin ML
Luskin E
O'Donnell CM
Azevedo CJ
Calabresi PA
Freeman L
Henry RG
Longbrake EE
Oh J
Papinutto N
Bilello M
Song JW
Kaisey M
Sicotte NL
Reich DS
Solomon AJ
Ontaneda D
Sati P
Absinta M
Schindler MK
Shinohara RT
Source :
Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging [J Neuroimaging] 2024 Oct 15. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 15.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are an MRI biomarker of chronic inflammation in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). PRLs may aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS. However, manual identification of PRLs is time-consuming and prone to poor interrater reliability. To address these challenges, the Automated Paramagnetic Rim Lesion (APRL) algorithm was developed to automate PRL detection. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of APRL for detecting PRLs in a multicenter setting.<br />Methods: We applied APRL to a multicenter dataset, which included 3-Tesla MRI acquired in 92 participants (43 with MS, 14 with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]/radiologically isolated syndrome [RIS], 35 without RIS/CIS/MS). Subsequently, we assessed APRL's performance by comparing its results with manual PRL assessments carried out by a team of trained raters.<br />Results: Among the 92 participants, expert raters identified 5637 white matter lesions and 148 PRLs. The automated segmentation method successfully captured 115 (78%) of the manually identified PRLs. Within these 115 identified lesions, APRL differentiated between manually identified PRLs and non-PRLs with an area under the curve (AUC) of .73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [.68, .78]). At the subject level, the count of APRL-identified PRLs predicted MS diagnosis with an AUC of .69 (95% CI: [.57, .81]).<br />Conclusion: Our study demonstrated APRL's capability to differentiate between PRLs and lesions without paramagnetic rims in a multicenter study. Automated identification of PRLs offers greater efficiency over manual identification and could facilitate large-scale assessments of PRLs in clinical trials.<br /> (© 2024 American Society of Neuroimaging.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1552-6569
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39410780
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.13242