Expansion of Medicaid Coverage of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reduces Health Disparity in Children and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) usage improves glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (PWD) and is accepted as the standard of care. The CGM utilization is lower in patients with public insurance and minorized ethnicities. In 2022, California Medicaid reduced its barriers to obtaining CGM coverage for PWD. It is unknown whether this policy change is sufficient to increase CGM usage. We hypothesize that the change in Medicaid coverage improved CGM uptake in children and young adults with T1D.
Methods: Data were extracted from electronic medical record of a large urban children's hospital in 2021 and 2022. The CGM usage was determined based on clinician documentation or the presence of CGM downloads. Kruskal-Wallis tests, Wald tests, and χ ² tests were used to test hypothesis ( P < .05). Mixed effects logistical regression analyses were performed.
Results: We included 878 and 892 PWD (age ≤ 21 years) in 2021 and 2022, respectively. In 2022, Medicaid insured 59.3% of patients. Between 2021 and 2022, CGM usage did not change for privately insured patients (84%) but increased from 41% to 58% for patients receiving Medicaid. In our mixed effects logistic regression model, CGM usage was higher in 2022 and in English speakers. Public insurance, black race, and patients' age were negatively associated with CGM usage.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that Medicaid expansion of CGM coverage increases its utilization for pediatric PWD but did not eliminate the disparity. Future studies are needed to identify barriers that preclude equity in technology uptake.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JCE is a consultant for Sanofi. Sanofi played no role in the design, execution, analysis, writing, or in the decision to publish this manuscript and had no editorial input. The remaining authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.