Back to Search Start Over

Estimating Uncertainty of Geographic Atrophy Segmentations with Bayesian Deep Learning.

Authors :
Spaide T
Rajesh AE
Gim N
Blazes M
Lee CS
Macivannan N
Lee G
Lewis W
Salehi A
de Sisternes L
Herrera G
Shen M
Gregori G
Rosenfeld PJ
Pramil V
Waheed N
Wu Y
Zhang Q
Lee AY
Source :
Ophthalmology science [Ophthalmol Sci] 2024 Jul 24; Vol. 5 (1), pp. 100587. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 24 (Print Publication: 2025).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To apply methods for quantifying uncertainty of deep learning segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA).<br />Design: Retrospective analysis of OCT images and model comparison.<br />Participants: One hundred twenty-six eyes from 87 participants with GA in the SWAGGER cohort of the Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Imaged with Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT) study.<br />Methods: The manual segmentations of GA lesions were conducted on structural subretinal pigment epithelium en face images from the SS-OCT images. Models were developed for 2 approximate Bayesian deep learning techniques, Monte Carlo dropout and ensemble, to assess the uncertainty of GA semantic segmentation and compared to a traditional deep learning model.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Model performance (Dice score) was compared. Uncertainty was calculated using the formula for Shannon Entropy.<br />Results: The output of both Bayesian technique models showed a greater number of pixels with high entropy than the standard model. Dice scores for the Monte Carlo dropout method (0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.93) and the ensemble method (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.91) were significantly higher ( P  < 0.001) than for the traditional model (0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.86).<br />Conclusions: Quantifying the uncertainty in a prediction of GA may improve trustworthiness of the models and aid clinicians in decision-making. The Bayesian deep learning techniques generated pixel-wise estimates of model uncertainty for segmentation, while also improving model performance compared with traditionally trained deep learning models.<br />Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.<br /> (© 2024 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2666-9145
Volume :
5
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ophthalmology science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39380882
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2024.100587