Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical Significance of Grade A Small-for-size Syndrome After Living Donor Liver Transplantation Utilizing the New Definition of Diagnostic Criteria: An International Multicenter Study.
- Source :
-
Transplantation [Transplantation] 2025 Feb 01; Vol. 109 (2), pp. e92-e100. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 08. - Publication Year :
- 2025
-
Abstract
- Background: New diagnostic criteria have recently been established to classify small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation into 3 groups based on severity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of grade A SFSS and identify the mortality risk.<br />Methods: We collected data from 406 patients diagnosed with grade A SFSS after living donor liver transplantation. Grade A SFSS is characterized by total bilirubin >5 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 7 or total bilirubin >5 mg/dL or ascites >1 L/d on POD 14. After propensity score matching, 193 patients were categorized into the up-trend group, down-trend group, and ascites group, with 43 patients (22.3%) in the up-trend group (total bilirubin on POD 7 < POD 14), 107 patients (55.4%) in the down-trend group (total bilirubin on POD 7 > POD 14), and 43 patients (22.3%) in the ascites group (only satisfying ascites criteria).<br />Results: There was no significant difference in survival between patients with grade A SFSS and those without SFSS ( P = 0.152). The up-trend group showed a higher 90-d mortality rate than the down-trend and ascites groups ( P = 0.025). The 1-y survival rate differed significantly between the groups (87.6%, 91.9%, and 97.7%, respectively; P = 0.044). The independent risk factors for survival were up-trend of total bilirubin, recipient age (65 y and older), model for end-stage liver disease score (≥30), and ABO incompatibility. Patients with ≥2 risk factors had worse survival rates than those with none and only 1 risk factor ( P < 0.001).<br />Conclusions: Although the survival rate was comparable between the grade A SFSS and non-SFSS cohorts, the up-trend group showed worse survival. Aggressive interventions should be considered for up-trend patients with risk factors.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Adult
Syndrome
Retrospective Studies
Organ Size
Treatment Outcome
Liver pathology
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Risk Assessment
Postoperative Complications mortality
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications diagnosis
Aged
Clinical Relevance
Liver Transplantation adverse effects
Living Donors
Ascites etiology
Ascites diagnosis
Bilirubin blood
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1534-6080
- Volume :
- 109
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Transplantation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39375889
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005225