The association between FLAIR vascular hyperintensities and outcomes in patients with border zone infarcts treated with medical therapy may vary with the infarct subtype.

Rationale and Objectives: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vessel hyperintensities (FVHs) reflect the haemodynamic state and may aid in predicting the prognosis of border zone (BZ) infarct patients. This study was to explore the relationship between FVHs and functional outcomes for different BZ infarct subtypes following medical therapy administration.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke were retrospectively enrolled and classified into internal BZ (IBZ) infarct, cortical BZ (CBZ) infarct and mixed-type infarct patients. FVHs were quantified using the FVH-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) system, and the scores were used to divide the patients into low-FVH (0-3) and high-FVH (4-7) groups. The FVH location and the cerebrovascular stenotic degree were recorded. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for poor outcomes (modified Rankin scale score ≥3).
Results: A total of 207 BZ infarct patients (IBZ, n = 130; CBZ, n = 52; mixed-type, n = 25) were included. The FVH score was positively correlated with cerebrovascular stenosis (r = 0.332, P < 0.001) in all patients. A high FVH score was associated with poor outcomes in all (OR 2.568, 95% CI (1.147 to 5.753), P = 0.022) and in CBZ infarct patients (OR 9.258, 95% CI 1.113 to 77.035), P = 0.040). FVH-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch was not significantly associated with outcomes in the entire patient group or in any subgroup.
Conclusions: A high FVH score is associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with CBZ infarcts but not in those with IBZ or mixed-type infarcts.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)