A Three-Day Prehabilitation Program is Cost-Effective for Preventing Pulmonary Complications after Heart Valve Surgery: A Health Economic Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Background: While prehabilitation (pre surgical exercise) effectively prevents postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), its cost-effectiveness in valve heart disease (VHD) remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a three-day prehabilitation program for reducing PPCs and improving quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in Chinese VHD patients.
Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial featuring concealed allocation, blinded evaluators, and an intention-to-treat analysis. In total, 165 patients scheduled for elective heart valve surgery at West China Hospital were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group participated in a three-day prehabilitation exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist while the control group received only standard preoperative education. Postoperative hospital costs were audited through the Hospital Information System, and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire was used to provide a 12-month estimation of QALY. Cost and effect differences were calculated through the bootstrapping method, with results presented in cost-effectiveness planes, alongside the associated cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). All costs were denominated in Chinese Yuan (CNY) at an average exchange rate of 6.73 CNY per US dollar in 2022.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital costs (8484 versus 9615 CNY, 95% CI -2403 to 140) or in the estimated QALYs (0.909 versus 0.898, 95% CI -0.013 to 0.034) between the intervention and control groups. However, costs for antibiotics (339 versus 667 CNY, 95% CI -605 to -51), nursing (1021 versus 1200 CNY, 95% CI -330 to -28), and electrocardiograph monitoring (685 versus 929 CNY, 95% CI -421 to -67) were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The CEAC indicated that the prehabilitation program has a 92.6% and 93% probability of being cost-effective in preventing PPCs and improving QALYs without incurring additional costs.
Conclusions: While the three-day prehabilitation program did not significantly improve health-related quality of life, it led to a reduction in postoperative hospital resource utilization. Furthermore, it showed a high probability of being cost-effective in both preventing PPCs and improving QALYs in Chinese patients undergoing valve surgery.
Clinical Registration Number: This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/) with the registration identifier ChiCTR2000039671.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)