Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Multiple Equations for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Calculation Against the Direct Homogeneous Method.
- Source :
-
Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis [J Lipid Atheroscler] 2024 Sep; Vol. 13 (3), pp. 348-357. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 15. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objective: Several equations have been proposed as alternatives for the reference method of measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). This study aimed to evaluate these alternatives in comparison to the homogeneous method and validate their clinical utility.<br />Methods: Data on the lipid profiles of 1,006 Sudanese individuals were analyzed. The paired t-test was used to compare the results of direct and calculated LDL-C. Bland-Altman plots were used to demonstrate the differences between the measured and calculated LDL-C against the mean values. Linear regression was conducted, using the correlation coefficient ( r ) to quantify the relationship between methods. The bias between measured and calculated LDL-C was compared to the National Cholesterol Education Program Laboratory Standardization Panel criteria (i.e., accuracy within ±4% of expected values).<br />Results: The Martin and Anandaraja equations showed no significant difference compared to directly measured LDL-C ( p >0.05). The DeLong equation indicated an insignificant difference only with a 99% confidence interval ( p >0.01). The Martin, DeLong, and Teerakanchana equations exhibited the smallest limits of agreement, with data points concentrated closely around the mean difference line. Linear regression analysis revealed strong positive correlations ( r >0.8) for most equations, except for the Ahmadi equation. The DeLong, Rao, and Martin equations demonstrated superior performance for LDL cutoff points (bias within ± 4%). The DeLong formula also showed superior performance at different lipid levels, closely followed by the Martin equation (bias within ±4%).<br />Conclusion: The DeLong and Martin equations outperformed others, such as the widely used Friedewald equation, in calculating LDL-C. Further validation studies are needed.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (© 2024 The Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2287-2892
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39355402
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2024.13.3.348