Back to Search Start Over

Ethical concerns in caring for persons with anorexia nervosa: content analysis of a series of documentations from ethics consultations.

Authors :
Westermair AL
Reiter-Theil S
Wäscher S
Trachsel M
Source :
BMC medical ethics [BMC Med Ethics] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 25 (1), pp. 102. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 01.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Caring for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) is associated with high levels of moral distress among healthcare professionals. The main moral conflict has been posited to be between applying coercion to prevent serious complications such as premature death and accepting treatment refusals. However, empirical evidence on this topic is scarce.<br />Methods: We identified all 19 documentations of ethics consultations (ECs) in the context of AN from one clinical ethics support service in Switzerland. These documentations were coded with a sequential deductive-inductive approach and the code system was interpreted in a case-based manner. Here, we present findings on patient characteristics and ethical concerns.<br />Findings: The ECs typically concerned an intensely pretreated, extremely underweight AN patient endangering herself by refusing the proposed treatment. In addition to the justifiability of coercion, frequent ethical concerns were whether further coerced treatment aimed at weight gain would be ineffective or even harmful, evidencing uncertainty about beneficence and non-maleficence and a conflict between these principles. Discussed options included harm reduction (e.g. psychotherapy without weight gain requirements) and palliation (e.g. initiating end-of-life care), the appropriateness of which were ethical concerns in themselves. Overall, nine different types of conflicts between or uncertainties regarding ethical principles were identified with a median of eight per case.<br />Conclusions: Ethical concerns in caring for persons with AN are diverse and complex. To deal with uncertainty about and conflict between respect for autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence, healthcare professionals consider non-curative approaches. However, currently, uncertainty around general justifiability, eligibility criteria, and concrete protocols hinders their adoption.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-6939
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC medical ethics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39354548
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01101-4