Ecological linkages between top-down designed benzothiazole-degrading consortia and selection strength: From performance to community structure and functional genes.

The inefficient biodegradation and incomplete mineralization of nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds (NHCs) have emerged as a pressing environmental concern. The top-down design offers potential solutions to this issue by targeting improvements in community function, but the ecological linkages between selection strength and the structure and function of desired microbiomes remain elusive. Herein, the integration of metagenomics, culture-based approach, non-targeted metabolite screening and enzymatic verification experiments revealed the effect of enrichment concentration on the top-down designed benzothiazole (BTH, a typical NHC)-degrading consortia. Significant differences were observed for the degradation efficiency and community structure under varying BTH selections. Notably, the enriched consortia at high concentrations of BTH were dominated by genus Rhodococcus, possessing higher degradation rates. Moreover, the isolate Rhodococcus pyridinivorans Rho48 displayed excellent efficiencies in BTH removal (98 %) and mineralization (∼ 60 %) through the hydroxylation and cleavage of thiazole and benzene rings, where cytochrome P450 enzyme was firstly reported to participate in BTH conversion. The functional annotation of 460 recovered genomes from the enriched consortia revealed diverse interspecific cooperation patterns that accounted for the BTH mineralization, particularly Nakamurella and Micropruina under low selection strength, and Rhodococcus and Marmoricola under high selection strength. This study highlights the significance of selection strength in top-down design of synthetic microbiomes for degrading refractory organic pollutants, providing valuable guidance for designing functionally optimized microbiomes used in environmental engineering.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)