Back to Search Start Over

Exploring Heterogeneity in the Cost-Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Acutely Ill Children-Insights From the Step-Up First-line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children Trial Using a Machine Learning Method.

Authors :
Hattab Z
Moler-Zapata S
Doherty E
Sadique Z
Ramnarayan P
O'Neill S
Source :
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [Value Health] 2025 Jan; Vol. 28 (1), pp. 60-69. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 28.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acutely ill children requiring noninvasive respiratory support.<br />Methods: Using data from the First-line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children trial, we explore heterogeneity at the patient and subgroup levels using 2 causal forest approaches and a seemingly unrelated regression approach for comparison. First-line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN60048867) involving 24 UK pediatric intensive care units. The Step-up trial focuses on acutely ill children aged 0 to 15 years, requiring noninvasive respiratory support. A total of 600 children were randomly assigned to HFNC and CPAP groups in a 1:1 allocation ratio, with 94 patients excluded because of data unavailability.<br />Results: The primary outcome is the incremental net monetary benefit (INB) of HFNC compared with CPAP, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year gain. INB is derived from total costs and quality-adjusted life years at 6 months. Subgroup analysis showed that some subgroups, such as male children, those aged less than 12 months, and those without severe respiratory distress at randomization, had more favorable INB results. Patient-level analysis revealed heterogeneity in INB estimates, particularly driven by the cost component, with greater uncertainty for those with higher INBs.<br />Conclusions: The estimated overall INB of HFNC is significantly larger for specific patient subgroups, suggesting that the cost-effectiveness of HFNC can be heterogeneous, which highlights the importance of considering patient characteristics in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HFNC.<br />Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section.<br /> (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4733
Volume :
28
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39349099
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.008