On the dose-response association of fine and ultrafine particles in an urban atmosphere: toxicological outcomes on bronchial cells at realistic doses of exposure at the Air Liquid Interface.

Air pollution and particulate matter (PM) are the leading environmental cause of death worldwide. Exposure limits have lowered to increase the protection of human health; accordingly, it becomes increasingly important to understand the toxicological mechanisms on cellular models at low airborne PM concentrations which are relevant for actual human exposure. The use of air liquid interface (ALI) models, which mimic the interaction between airborne pollutants and lung epithelia, is also gaining importance in inhalation toxicological studies. This study reports the effects of ALI direct exposure of bronchial epithelial cells BEAS-2B to ambient PM ₁ (i.e. particles with aerodynamic diameter lower than 1 μm). Gene expression (HMOX, Cxcl-8, ATM, Gadd45-a and NQO1), interleukin (IL)-8 release, and DNA damage (Comet assay) were evaluated after 24 h of exposure. We report the dose-response curves of the selected toxicological outcomes, together with the concentration-response association and we show that the two curves differ for specific responses highlighting that concentration-response association may be not relevant for understanding toxicological outcomes. Noteworthy, we show that pro-oxidant effects may be driven by the deposition of freshly emitted particles, regardless of the airborne PM ₁ mass concentration. Furthermore, we show that reference airborne PM ₁ metrics, namely airborne mass concentration, may not always reflect the toxicological process triggered by the aerosol. These findings underscore the importance of considering different aerosol metrics to assess the toxicological potency of fine and ultrafine particles. To better protect human health additional metrics should be defined, than account for the properties of the entire aerosol mixture including specific as particle size (i.e. particles with aerodynamic diameter lower than 20 nm), the relevant aerosol sources (e.g., traffic combustion, secondary organic aerosol …) as well as their atmospheric processing (freshly emitted vs aged ones).
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Maurizio Gualtieri reports financial support was provided by Italian Ministry of the University. Maurizio Gualtieri reports financial support was provided by European Union NextGenerationEU, National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) Mission 4. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)