Back to Search Start Over

Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: Results from a Multicenter Network.

Authors :
Futyma P
Sultan A
Zarębski Ł
Imnadze G
Maslova V
Bordignon S
Kousta M
Knecht S
Pavlović N
Peichl P
Lian E
Kueffer T
Scherr D
Pfeffer M
Moskal P
Gabriel C
Antolič B
Wałek P
Chen S
Martinek M
Kollias G
Derndorfer M
Seidl S
Schmidt B
Lüker J
Steven D
Sommer P
Jastrzębski M
Kautzner J
Reichlin T
Sticherling C
Pürerfellner H
Enriquez A
Wörmann J
Chun JKR
Source :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2024 Sep 27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 27.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Advanced ablation strategies are needed to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular contractions (PVC) refractory to standard unipolar radiofrequency ablation (Uni-RFA). Bipolar radiofrequency catheter ablation (Bi-RFA) has emerged as a treatment option for refractory VT, PVC. Multicenter registry data on the use of Bi-RFA in the setting of refractory VT and PVC are lacking.<br />Purpose: The aim of this Bi-RFA registry is to determine its real-world safety, feasibility, and efficacy in patients with refractory VT/PVC.<br />Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing Bi-RFA at sixteen European centers for recurring VT/PVC after at least one standard Uni-RFA were included. Second ablation catheter was used instead of a dispersive patch and was positioned at the opposite site of the ablation target.<br />Results: Between March 2021 and August 2024, ninety-one patients underwent 94 Bi-RFA procedures (74 males, age 62±13, prior Uni-RFA range 1-8). Indications were recurrence of PVC (n=56), VT (n=20), electrical storm (n=13), or PVC-triggered ventricular fibrillation (n=2). Procedural time was 160±73min, Bi-RFA time 426±286s, mean Uni-RFA time 819±697s. Elimination of clinical VT/PVC was achieved in 67 (74%) patients, suppression of VT/PVC in a further 10 (11%) patients. In the remaining 14 patients (15%) no effect on VT/PVC was observed. Three major complications occurred: coronary artery occlusion, AV block and arteriovenous fistula. Follow-up lasted 7±8 months. Nineteen (61%) remained VT-free. ≥80% PVC burden reduction was achieved in 45 (78%).<br />Conclusions: This real-world registry data indicates that Bi-RFA appears safe, is feasible, and effective in the majority of patients with VT/PVC.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2092
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39331050
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae248