Colonization with resistant bacteria in hospital employees: an epidemiological surveillance and typing study.

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, molecular epidemiology, and risk factors for gut colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in healthcare workers (HCWs). In September/October 2022, we performed a cross-sectional study among HCW from 14 institutions in Northeastern Switzerland. HCWs reported risk factors for antimicrobial resistance (covering the last 12-24 months) and provided rectal swabs. Swabs were screened for ESBL-E, CPE, and VRE; whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to assess the genetic relatedness. Logistic regression was used to identify occupational and non-occupational risk factors. Among approximately 22,500 employees, 1,209 participated (median age 46 years, 82% female). Prevalences of ESBL-E ( n = 65) and CPE ( n = 1) were 5.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2-6.8] and 0.1% (95% CI 0.0-0.5), respectively; no VREs were detected. In the multivariable analysis, non-European ethnicity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.0, 95% CI 1.4-27.3], travel to high-risk countries (aOR 4.9, 95% CI 2.5-9.3), systemic antibiotics (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.7), antibiotic eye drops (aOR 4.7, 95% CI 1.7-11.9), and monthly sushi consumption (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.3) were positively associated with ESBL-E colonization, whereas alcohol consumption (aOR 0.5 per glass/week, 95% CI 0.3-0.9) was negatively associated with ESBL-E colonization. Occupational factors showed no association. Among ESBL- Escherichia coli , ST131 (15 of 61, 25%) and bla _CTX-M-15 (37/61; 61%) were most common; one isolate co-harbored bla _OXA-244 . WGS data did not show relevant clustering. Occupational exposure is not associated with ESBL-E colonization in HCW. Given the potential public health and antibiotic stewardship implications, the role of sushi consumption and antibiotic eye drops as risk factors should be further elucidated.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.