Back to Search Start Over

Postoperative urinary incontinence following BPH surgery: insights from a comprehensive national database analysis.

Authors :
Licari LC
Bologna E
Manfredi C
Franco A
Ditonno F
DE Nunzio C
Franco G
Cindolo L
Leonardo C
Adelstein SA
Fiori C
Cherullo EE
Olweny EO
Autorino R
Source :
Minerva urology and nephrology [Minerva Urol Nephrol] 2024 Oct; Vol. 76 (5), pp. 618-624.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) is a feared complication of BPH surgery. Our study aims to investigate the incidence of UI among patients undergoing different procedures for BPH.<br />Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a large national database, containing patient records between 2011 and 2022. The most employed surgical procedures for BPH were considered, including TURP, Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP), Holmium/Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP/ThuLEP), Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP), minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (Lap/Rob SP), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL), Robotic Waterjet Treatment (RWT - Aquablation <superscript>®</superscript> ), Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT - Rezum <superscript>®</superscript> ) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE). Rates of any type of UI, including stress UI (SUI), urge UI (UUI) and mixed UI (MUI) were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of "persistent" postoperative UI, defined as the presence of an active UI diagnosis at 12 months post-surgery.<br />Results: Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 11,017 (4.01%) experienced persistent UI. UUI rates varied between 0.62% (PAE) and 2.71% (PVP), SUI ranged from 0.04% (PAE) and 2.75% (Lap/Rob SP), while MUI between 0.11% (PAE) and 1.17% (HoLEP/ThuLEP). On multivariable analysis, HoLEP/ThuLEP (OR 1.612; 95% CI: 1.508-1.721; P<0.001), PVP (OR 1.164; 95% CI:1.122-1.208; P<0.001), Open SP (OR 1.424; 95% CI:1.241- 1.624; P<0.001), and Lap/Rob SP (OR 1.667; 95% CI:1.119-2.384; P<0.01) showed significant higher likelihood of UI compared to TURP. PUL (OR 0.604; 95% CI:0.566-0.644; P<0.001), WVTT (OR 0.661; 95% CI:0.579-0.752; P<0.001), RWT (OR 0.434; 95% CI:0.216-0.767; P<0.01), and PAE (OR 0.178; 95% CI:0.111-0.269; P<0.001) were associated with lower likelihood of UI.<br />Conclusions: UI remains a concerning complication following BPH surgery, but it is an uncommon event affecting <5% of patients. Some differences in UI rates and risk might exist among various BPH procedures. These findings underscore the need for thorough patient selection and counseling.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2724-6442
Volume :
76
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Minerva urology and nephrology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39320252
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05802-6