Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Imaging Performance of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors :
Shibuki S
Saida T
Mori K
Ishiguro T
Amano T
Yoshida M
Miyata M
Satoh T
Nakajima T
Source :
The Indian journal of radiology & imaging [Indian J Radiol Imaging] 2024 Jul 12; Vol. 34 (4), pp. 661-669. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 12 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective  This article evaluates the ability of low-energy (40 keV) virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) in the local diagnosis of cervical cancer compared with that of conventional computed tomography (C-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using clinicopathologic staging as a reference. Methods  This prospective study included 33 patients with pathologically confirmed cervical cancer who underwent dual-energy CT and MRI between 2021 and 2022. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the tumor-to-myometrium was compared between C-CT and VMI. Additionally, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each local diagnostic parameter were compared between C-CT, VMI, and MRI. Interradiologist agreement was also assessed. Results  The mean CNR was significantly higher on VMI ( p  = 0.002). No significant difference in AUC was found between C-CT and VMI for all local diagnostic parameters, and the specificity of VMI was often significantly less than that of MRI. For parametrial invasion, mean sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for C-CT, VMI, and MRI were 0.81, 0.99, 0.93; 0.64, 0.35, 0.79; and 0.73, 0.67, 0.86, respectively, and MRI had significantly higher specificity and AUC than that of VMI ( p  = 0.013 and 0.008, respectively). Interradiologist agreement was higher for VMI than C-CT and for MRI than VMI. Conclusion  The CNR of VMI was significantly higher than C-CT and interradiologist agreement was better than with C-CT; however, the overall diagnostic performance of VMI did not significantly differ from C-CT and was inferior to MRI. VMI was characterized by low specificity, which should be understood and used for reading.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared.<br /> (Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0971-3026
Volume :
34
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Indian journal of radiology & imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39318563
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787780