Antidepressant-like effects of the leaf extract of Mallotus oppositifolius (Geiseler) Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) in the chronic unpredictable mild stress model: A role of the gut-brain axis.

The gut microbiota has been posited as a target for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Herein, we investigated the effect of the hydroethanolic leaf extract of Mallotus oppositifolius (MOE) on the gut microbiota of mice and how this contributes to its known antidepressant-like effect. A 6-week chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) procedure was employed in 7 groups of mice to induce depression. From the third week, oral MOE treatments (10, 30, 100 mg/kg) and two reference drugs, fluoxetine (12 mg/kg) and minocycline (40 mg/kg), known to affect the gut microbiota, were administered. The sixth and seventh groups were the vehicle stressed (VEH-S) and non-stressed groups (VEH-NS). Changes in depressive-like behaviors were assessed using sucrose preference test while the forced swimming test (FST) was used to assess sustained antidepressant-effect after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, changes in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampal serotonin (5-HT) levels were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The effect of treatment on the profile of the gut microbiota of the groups was elucidated using 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing. MOE and reference drugs reversed the depression-associated reduction in sucrose preference when compared to VEH-S. MOE (with peak effect at 30 mg/kg) reduced immobility while increasing swimming and climbing behaviors. MOE reversed CUMS-induced reduction of 5-HT concentration in PFC and hippocampus. The behavioral effects of MOE were associated with shifts in the gut microbiota of CUMS-exposed mice. The study has provided seminal evidence that MOE ameliorates CUMS-induced depressive symptoms by modulating gut microbiota and increasing brain 5-HT levels.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 International Brain Research Organization (IBRO). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)