Evaluating the Impact of Post-Esophagectomy Exercise on 2- and 5-Year Survival: Findings from the PERFECT Trial.

Purpose: Despite recent treatment advances, esophageal cancer still has poor survival and a high morbidity. Exploratory evidence suggests that exercise can reduce cancer-related mortality and recurrence rates. Here, we investigated the effects of an exercise intervention in the first year after esophagectomy on survival in participants of the Physical ExeRcise Following Esophageal Cancer Treatment (PERFECT)-trial.
Methods: In the PERFECT-trial, esophageal cancer patients who had undergone esophagectomy were randomized to a 12-week exercise program (EX) or the control group (CG). We assessed 2- and 5-year (progression-free) survival. (Un)adjusted Cox Proportional-Hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for comparison between the trial arms. Sensitivity analyses, excluding patients with events within the exercise intervention period, were performed.
Results: In total, 120 participants (EX = 61; CG = 59) were included in the PERFECT-trial. After 2-year follow-up, no significant difference in the risk of death or progression between EX and CG was found (adjusted HR = 1.65, 95% CI [0.75-3.63] and 1.38, 95% CI [0.76-2.50], respectively). After excluding patients with events during the intervention period (EX = 8; CG = 4), 2-year HRs for death (1.03, 95% CI [0.41-2.56]) and progression (1.26, 95% CI [0.64-2.48]) both decreased and remained insignificant. No significant effects were found on 5-year mortality (1.03, 95% CI [0.57-1.84]) and progression (1.21, 95% CI [0.72-2.04]) either. Sensitivity-analysis resulted in attenuated 5-year HRs for mortality (0.82, 95% CI [0.42-1.58]) and progression (1.08, 95% CI [0.61-1.92]).
Conclusions: The results indicate no benefit of a 12-week exercise program in the first year post-esophagectomy on 2- and 5-year (progression-free) survival in esophageal cancer patients. The absence of beneficial effects may be explained by the relatively short exercise program, which was performed after treatment completion.
Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Funding Source: The World Cancer Research Fund, The Netherlands (WCRF NL, project number 2013/997), financially supported this study. M. I. van Berge Henegouwen is consultant for Viatris, Johnson & Johnson, BBraun, Stryker and Medtronic. All fees paid to institution. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine.)