Gait Characteristics and Deviation Factors of Backward Walking in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Background: Despite growing applications of backward walking (BW) in assessing and rehabilitating neuromuscular conditions, its effects on gait in chronic ankle instability (CAI) remain unclear. Moreover, linking patient-reported and clinically generated measures is imperative for understanding CAI.
Hypotheses: Patients with CAI will exhibit worse and compensatory spatio-temporal and kinetic gait parameters during BW, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will be correlated significantly with gait parameters.
Study Design: Case-control study.
Level of Evidence: Level 4.
Methods: A total of 46 volunteers participated (23 per group). Patients filled out scales for pain, functions, and fear-avoidance beliefs before testing. All participants walked 6 times each in both forward and backward conditions, and gait was recorded using the Win-Track system. A 2-way mixed analysis of variance was performed to compare gait parameters. The relationship between PRO and gait outcomes was assessed through the Pearson product correlation coefficient.
Results: The CAI group demonstrated prolonged support and swing phases, increased walk-off angle, and plantar pressure area, but decreased step length and plantar pressure versus controls ( P < 0.05). The CAI group had a smaller right walk-off angle during BW than FW; the control group showed the opposite ( P < 0.05). The left single stance duration was greater in the CAI group, while the right was not ( P < 0.05). PRO correlated significantly with gait parameters, particularly spatial parameters ( P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The CAI group exhibited worse gait parameters during BW. The CAI group exhibited a characteristic compensatory gait pattern. Linking the self-reported scores provides a better representation of gait changes in CAI.
Clinical Relevance: These results suggest that BW may be an effective strategy for identifying and evaluating CAI. It may be feasible to apply BW to the rehabilitation of CAI.
Competing Interests: The authors report no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.