Back to Search Start Over

A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice.

Authors :
Albert FA
Seidu AA
Mason HM
Anderson E
Alele FO
Heggarty P
Hollins A
Gupta TS
Hays RB
McArthur L
Malau-Aduli BS
Source :
BMC medical education [BMC Med Educ] 2024 Sep 13; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 997. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Medical education offers the foundational base for future healthcare professionals, with basic sciences playing a pivotal role in providing essential knowledge and skills for clinical practice. However, the long-term retention and application of this knowledge in clinical practice remain a significant challenge. This systematic review synthesised global evidence from diverse studies on the short / long-term retention and clinical application of basic sciences among medical doctors.<br />Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Emcare, and Informit. The review included studies that encompassed a variety of study designs, participant groups, and educational interventions. The Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool was utilised to assess the quality of the reviewed studies.<br />Results: A total of 10 studies were included in the review. The findings revealed that rehearsals significantly optimise the retention of basic science knowledge among medical practitioners. Retention varied by discipline, with medical practitioners retaining more knowledge in anatomy (mean scores ranging from 45.0 to 82.9%), while microbiology had the lowest retention score (39.1%). Factors influencing retention included age, gender, and curriculum type. Educational interventions such as targeted courses, integration of basic sciences with clinical skills, generative retrieval and continuous quality improvement in the curriculum were found to enhance both knowledge retention and clinical reasoning. The concept of 'encapsulated knowledge' demonstrates that integrated basic science knowledge helps in synthesising clinical presentations, reducing the need for detailed recall as clinical experience increases. The reviewed studies primarily involved interns and surgeons, leaving a significant gap in research for specialties like internal medicine and primary care/ general practice.<br />Conclusion: Detailed retention of basic science knowledge may diminish over time; however, the conceptual framework remains essential for ongoing learning and clinical reasoning. This review's findings highlight the need for specialised educational interventions to improve long-term retention. Continuous professional development and targeted educational techniques are vital for maintaining clinical competence and applying basic science knowledge effectively throughout a medical career. Further research is needed to address gaps in specialty-specific knowledge application and the impact of different instructional methods.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-6920
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC medical education
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39272053
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8