Back to Search Start Over

A hand-in-hand phenomenon in older adults: Increased risk of frailty in geriatric outpatients associated with handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness.

Authors :
Güner M
Ceylan S
Okyar Baş A
Koca M
Öztürk Y
Doğu BB
Hali L MG
Cankurtaran M
Balci C
Source :
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) [Clin Nutr] 2024 Oct; Vol. 43 (10), pp. 2381-2387. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives: Handgrip strength (HGS) is accepted as a predictor of overall health status and a biomarker of aging, besides negative health outcomes and mortality. While differences in HGS between the dominant and non-dominant hands are expected, substantial discrepancies may signal impaired muscle function. This study aims to investigate whether handgrip asymmetry can serve as a reliable indicator of frailty in a diverse population of older adults.<br />Design: Cross-sectional study.<br />Setting and Participants: A total of 512 patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted to the geriatric medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were enrolled in the study.<br />Methods: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to assess the overall level of frailty of the study population. The highest recorded HGS values from the non-dominant and dominant hand were used to calculate the HGS ratio. Those with a HGS ratio of dominant and non-dominant hand <0.90 or >1.10 were defined as HGS asymmetry.<br />Results: Of the whole study group, 61.1% was female and the mean age was 73.2 ± 6.1 years. The ratio of the participants living with frailty was 57.6% (n = 219). The number of patients with HGS asymmetry was 264 (51.6%), and 48.4% (n = 248) of the study population had symmetric HGS. The normal and symmetric HGS was found in 40.2% of the non-frail group, whereas it was 23.7% in patients living with frailty. Furthermore, the ratio of low and asymmetric HGS was 16.3% in the non-frail group, and 35.0% in the patients living with frailty (p < 0.001). The presence of asymmetric and low HGS increased the risk of frailty three times independently of other confounding factors (OR:3.08; 95% CI:1.48-6.43; p = 0.003).<br />Conclusions and Implications: Identifying HGS asymmetry along with low HGS as potential indicators of frailty may provide clinicians with a clear and quantifiable criterion for assessing older patients.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-1983
Volume :
43
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39270611
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.010