Back to Search
Start Over
Comparative evaluation of early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus ceftazidime/avibactam for non-COVID-19 patients with pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- Source :
-
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy [J Antimicrob Chemother] 2024 Nov 04; Vol. 79 (11), pp. 2954-2964. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are commonly used in patients with MDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) pneumonia (PNA). This study compared outcomes between non-COVID-19 hospitalized patients with MDR-PSA PNA who received ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam.<br />Methods: The study included non-COVID-19 adult hospitalized patients with MDR-PSA PNA in the PINC AI Healthcare Database (2016-22) who received ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam within 3 days of index culture for ≥2 days. Outcomes were mortality, recurrent MDR-PSA PNA, discharge destination, post-index culture day length of stay (LOS) and costs (in US dollars, USD), and hospital readmission.<br />Results: The final sample included 197 patients (117 ceftolozane/tazobactam, 80 ceftazidime/avibactam). No significant differences were observed in mortality and post-index culture LOS and costs between groups. In the multivariable analyses, patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam versus ceftazidime/avibactam had lower recurrent MDR-PSA PNA (7.9% versus 18.0%, P = 0.03) and 60 day PNA-related readmissions (11.1% versus 28.5%, P = 0.03) and were more likely to be discharged home (25.8% versus 9.8%, P = 0.03). Compared with ceftazidime/avibactam patients, ceftolozane/tazobactam patients had lower adjusted median total antibiotic costs (5052 USD versus 8099 USD, P = 0.003) and lower adjusted median comparator (ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam) antibiotic costs (3938 USD versus 6441 USD, P = 0.005). In the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysis, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient was more likely to have a more favourable outcome than a ceftazidime/avibactam-treated patient [DOOR probability: 59.6% (95% CI: 52.5%-66.8%)].<br />Conclusions: Early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam may offer some clinical and cost benefits over ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with MDR-PSA PNA. Further large-scale studies are necessary to comprehensively understand the outcomes associated with these treatments for MDR-PSA PNA.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Aged
Treatment Outcome
Adult
Pneumonia, Bacterial drug therapy
Pneumonia, Bacterial mortality
Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over
Drug Combinations
Cephalosporins therapeutic use
Ceftazidime therapeutic use
Azabicyclo Compounds therapeutic use
Azabicyclo Compounds economics
Tazobactam therapeutic use
Pseudomonas aeruginosa drug effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use
Anti-Bacterial Agents economics
Pseudomonas Infections drug therapy
Pseudomonas Infections mortality
Pseudomonas Infections microbiology
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1460-2091
- Volume :
- 79
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39258877
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae313